Why Typescript Sucks

Typescript Programming

As a software developer who has worked with TypeScript extensively, I can confidently say that TypeScript is not without its flaws. While many developers praise TypeScript for its static typing and enhanced tooling, there are certain aspects of this language that can cause frustration and hinder productivity. In this article, I will delve deep into the reasons why TypeScript can sometimes leave developers feeling unsatisfied.

The Learning Curve

One of the main challenges when starting with TypeScript is the steep learning curve. Coming from a JavaScript background, it takes time and effort to understand the nuances of TypeScript’s type system and how to effectively leverage its features. The complex type annotations and generics can be intimidating for beginners, and the strictness of TypeScript’s compiler can be overwhelming. This learning curve can slow down development and lead to frustration.

Verbose Syntax

While TypeScript provides added safety and clarity through static typing, its syntax can sometimes be verbose and bloated. Type annotations need to be added to every variable, function parameter, and function return type, which can clutter the codebase and make it harder to read. Additionally, TypeScript’s type inference is not always perfect, requiring developers to annotate types explicitly, even when it may seem unnecessary.

Limited JavaScript Interoperability

TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript, which means that valid JavaScript code can be written in TypeScript. However, there are instances where TypeScript’s stricter type system can clash with existing JavaScript code. This can lead to frustrating situations where seemingly valid JavaScript code fails to compile in TypeScript. While there are workarounds and type libraries available, the limited interoperability can be a hurdle when dealing with large JavaScript codebases.

Compilation Time

Due to TypeScript’s static type checking, the compilation process can be slower compared to regular JavaScript. As the codebase grows larger and more complex, the compilation time increases significantly. This can be a major drawback, especially during development where quick feedback is crucial. Waiting for TypeScript to compile can slow down the development workflow and decrease overall productivity.

Lack of Official Standards

Unlike JavaScript, which has the ECMAScript standard to ensure cross-platform compatibility and consistency, TypeScript lacks an official standard. This means that the language features and tooling can vary between different TypeScript versions and editors. It can be frustrating to deal with compatibility issues and outdated documentation, forcing developers to constantly stay up to date with the latest TypeScript releases.


While TypeScript offers many benefits, it is important to acknowledge its shortcomings. The learning curve, verbose syntax, limited JavaScript interoperability, longer compilation times, and lack of official standards can make TypeScript feel frustrating and cumbersome at times. However, it is worth noting that TypeScript is constantly evolving, and many of these issues are being addressed in each new release. Ultimately, it is up to developers to weigh the pros and cons and decide if TypeScript is the right choice for their projects.