Why Cant We All Just Golang

Go Programming

As a programmer, I’ve often wrestled with the question: “Why can’t we all just golang?” For me, the journey into the world of Go programming language has been both challenging and rewarding. In this article, I want to delve deeper into the reasons why the adoption of Go hasn’t been as universal as some might hope, and share my personal insights into the language.

The Case for Go

Go, commonly referred to as golang, has gained popularity for its simplicity, efficiency, and robustness. Its concurrency model, which includes goroutines and channels, makes concurrent programming remarkably straightforward. The language’s emphasis on readability, performance, and built-in tooling makes it an appealing choice for a wide range of applications.

Resistance to Change

One of the primary reasons why not everyone is golang comes down to familiarity and inertia. Many developers are deeply entrenched in their current programming languages, frameworks, and tools. The prospect of learning a new language, adapting to new syntax, and embracing different paradigms can be daunting. From my own experience, the initial learning curve of Go can be steep, especially for those coming from more high-level and dynamically-typed languages.

Library and Ecosystem Concerns

Another factor that hinders widespread adoption of Go is its library and ecosystem support. While the standard library of Go is extensive and well-designed, the broader open-source ecosystem is not as mature as those of languages like Python, JavaScript, or Java. This can make it challenging to find comprehensive and battle-tested libraries for specific use cases, leading many developers to stick with languages that offer a wider range of third-party packages and frameworks.

Corporate Backing and Support

The backing and support of major technology companies have played a significant role in the success of many programming languages. While Go is developed and maintained by a prominent tech giant, Google, its adoption by other industry leaders and the overall corporate support for the language may not be as widespread as it is for other languages. This can influence the perception of Go’s long-term viability and the level of investment in training and tooling by organizations.

Community and Advocacy

The community and advocacy surrounding a programming language can be a decisive factor in its adoption. While the Go community is known for its friendliness, helpfulness, and dedication to best practices, it may not have the same level of visibility and advocacy as communities of other languages. This can impact the availability of resources, support, and the overall enthusiasm for the language, especially among developers who heavily rely on community-driven content and events.


While the question “Why can’t we all just golang?” may not have a straightforward answer, it’s clear that the adoption of any programming language is influenced by a complex interplay of technical, cultural, and community factors. Personally, I believe that Go’s strengths in terms of performance, concurrency, and developer experience make it a compelling choice for a wide range of applications. However, the challenges of overcoming inertia, building a robust ecosystem, and fostering widespread community support are all crucial in driving the universal adoption of Go.