Should We Put Emphasis On Python 2 Or 3

Python Programming

As a developer who has worked extensively with both Python 2 and Python 3, I often find myself contemplating the question: should we put emphasis on Python 2 or Python 3? This debate has been ongoing for quite some time now, with passionate arguments on both sides. In this article, I will delve deep into the details of this discussion and provide my personal insights.

Introduction to Python 2 and Python 3

Python, a versatile and powerful programming language, has two major versions currently in use: Python 2 and Python 3. Python 2 was released in 2000, while Python 3 was introduced in 2008. Despite the release of Python 3, many developers and organizations still rely on Python 2 for their projects.

Python 2 and Python 3 have some differences in syntax, functionality, and features. These differences have led to a divide in the Python community, with some favoring the widespread use of Python 2, while others advocate for the adoption of Python 3.

Arguments for Putting Emphasis on Python 2

Supporters of Python 2 argue that it has a large library ecosystem and mature packages that may not be fully compatible with Python 3. Some legacy systems and projects also heavily depend on Python 2, making it necessary to continue supporting and maintaining it. Additionally, Python 2 codebases may require significant effort and resources to migrate to Python 3, which can be a deterrent for some organizations.

Beyond practical considerations, some developers simply prefer the syntax and features of Python 2. They may find it more intuitive or comfortable, having spent a significant amount of time working with it. This personal preference can influence their choice to put emphasis on Python 2.

Arguments for Putting Emphasis on Python 3

On the other hand, proponents of Python 3 highlight its numerous improvements over Python 2. Python 3 offers better Unicode support, enhanced security features, and a more consistent and cleaner syntax. It also introduces new features and modules that improve development productivity.

Python 3’s design decisions were driven by the desire to address the shortcomings and limitations of Python 2. By putting emphasis on Python 3, developers can take advantage of the latest enhancements and ensure their code is built on a more robust and future-proof foundation.

My Personal Take

Having worked extensively with both Python 2 and Python 3, I firmly believe that putting emphasis on Python 3 is the way forward. While I understand the concerns of those who rely on Python 2, I believe that the benefits of Python 3 outweigh the initial challenges of migration.

Python 3 offers improved language features, a more modern and consistent syntax, and better support for internationalization. It also benefits from an active and thriving community, with new libraries and frameworks being developed specifically for Python 3.

As a developer, I believe it is essential to embrace change and adapt to the evolving landscape of technology. By putting emphasis on Python 3, we can leverage the advancements it brings and contribute to the growth of the Python ecosystem.


In conclusion, the debate between Python 2 and Python 3 continues to spark discussion among developers. While there are valid arguments for both sides, my personal stance is to put emphasis on Python 3. The improvements and enhancements introduced in Python 3 make it a more compelling choice for development projects.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to prioritize Python 2 or Python 3 will depend on the specific needs and constraints of each project and organization. However, I encourage developers to consider the long-term benefits and advancements provided by Python 3 as they make their choice.